Skip to content
Lifestyle

The History of Fendi: A 100-Year Dynasty of Family, Fur, and Fashion

Updated
10 min read
A person wearing a white dress and white sneakers is walking past a bright green garage door, holding a designer handbag. In the bottom right corner, an image of a person with white hair and sunglasses is overlaid.
In this article 10 sections

Fendi is more interesting when you look past the FF logo. I would start with the women who built the business, then compare the Baguette’s compact shape with the Peekaboo’s opening interior. That tells me far more about the house than a list of famous customers. Founded in Rome in 1925, Fendi celebrated its centenary in 2025; its story now includes Maria Grazia Chiuri as Chief Creative Officer and Silvia Venturini Fendi as Honorary President.

My favourite thread is the tension between a recognisable design and the many ways it can be remade. A small bag can become a surface for elaborate weaving; an apparently restrained bag can hide its most playful detail inside. This is researched history and editorial interpretation, not a claim that I handled every archive piece or tested the current bags.

The retained hero combines a Karl Lagerfeld portrait with a separate fashion image. It is an editorial composite, not a photograph of one shared scene.

Find more fashion and design coverage in our Lifestyle section.

Fendi history at a glance: the dates worth keeping separate

I would keep a short chronology handy, but not force every milestone into a single, frictionless brand legend. Founding a business, opening a boutique, joining a creative team and showing a collection are different events. The sources sometimes date them differently; the important distinctions follow the timeline.

  • 1925: foundation in Rome. Adele and Edoardo Fendi establish the house. LVMH’s archive caption dates the first Via del Plebiscito boutique photograph to 1926, so I would not use the foundation date as proof of every retail-opening detail.
  • The second generation: Paola, Anna, Franca, Carla and Alda develop the family business. Marie Claire’s retrospective places their involvement in 1946; the official house accounts emphasise their collective leadership.
  • 1965–2019: Karl Lagerfeld. The sisters recruit him in 1965, beginning a 54-year collaboration.
  • 1965: FF. Fendi links the signature to Lagerfeld’s first year and the “Fun Fur” direction. The precise speed of an often-retold sketch is not needed to explain the design.
  • 1997: Baguette. Silvia Venturini Fendi’s compact shoulder-bag design becomes a defining house reference.
  • 2000/2001: the corporate transition. LVMH’s own profile records acquisition in 2000 and majority ownership in 2001. Those are not interchangeable milestones.
  • 2007: Great Wall of China show. The setting is spectacular; the fabric supplier’s account below also gives a more tangible view of the work behind a special Baguette made for it.
  • 2020–2024: Kim Jones’s womenswear and couture tenure. Silvia Venturini Fendi subsequently directs the women’s collections during the centenary year. The next two appointments change their responsibilities again.
  • October 2025: Silvia becomes Honorary President from 1 October; Chiuri’s appointment as Chief Creative Officer is announced on 14 October.
  • 2026: Chiuri presents her first ready-to-wear collection for the house in Milan in February and her first Fendi couture collection in Rome in July.
Brown FF-pattern tote with tan handles, shoulder strap and large Fendi Roma lettering
A tote example, not an illustration of the Baguette or Peekaboo construction.

Rome, 1925: start with the workshop, not the mythology

Fendi’s atelier account traces the business to Adele Casagrande and Edoardo Fendi’s Roman fur-and-leather workshop. The 1925 foundation is clear; the LVMH profile separately captions the first boutique in 1926. I would preserve that distinction rather than pretend all the sources describe exactly the same opening event.

What interests me is the material-led starting point. It explains why a history of Fendi needs room for techniques and construction, not just designers’ portraits. It does not prove that every later product is exceptional, or require a reader to approve of fur. Historical importance and a purchasing decision are separate judgments.

Archive collage with a group at a desk, a workshop, a runway outfit and a portrait of five young women
Retained archive collage; separate images, not a single dated workshop scene.

The five sisters: a business built through shared work

The five daughters—Paola, Anna, Franca, Carla and Alda—are central to the second-generation story. Marie Claire’s retrospective dates their entry to 1946. I would not combine that with an uncorroborated death-date anecdote and present a tidy succession scene as established history. The stronger, supported point is that their leadership precedes the Lagerfeld collaboration.

I find that collective structure more compelling than a lone-genius account. Hiring an outside designer did not erase the family’s part in the business. Chiuri’s later appointment statement explicitly remembers beginning her career under the sisters’ guidance. Their importance belongs in the story of how talent was developed, not in a decorative family-tree sidebar.

Lagerfeld, 1965–2019: change the material, not just the logo

Fendi describes Lagerfeld’s work as a move towards lighter constructions, colour and graphic experimentation. I would look at the resulting techniques before repeating the language of revolution. The atelier explains inlay as assembling differently shaped pieces into patterns, and shibori as a dyeing approach. Those are concrete things to investigate, rather than a claim that no designer had ever imagined colour before.

The official atelier history links FF to 1965 and “Fun Fur”. I like the tension: a very visible logo emerges from a material experiment, then becomes something people recognise without knowing that origin. But recognising it is not the same as authenticating a bag. A repeating motif alone cannot establish where an item came from.

Karl Lagerfeld in a black suit standing on a table in front of shelves of books
Existing Lagerfeld portrait; not evidence of a particular Fendi design being made.

The bags: why the construction deserves the attention

The Baguette and Peekaboo give me two distinct ways into the history. I would not describe either as a guaranteed investment or assume that a name tells me the capacity of every version. For an independent museum reference, the Met records a 1990s Fendi fur coat, object 2002.555.7. That is evidence of a specific collection object—not evidence that every current handbag is museum-quality.

Fashion visual of a woman in a brown sweater and tan skirt carrying a white Fendi Roma tote
Existing fashion visual; no location, purchase or use test is established here.

The Baguette: the small shape is only half the story

Silvia Venturini Fendi’s 1997 Baguette became closely associated with Carrie Bradshaw in Sex and the City. Its 25th anniversary brought a New York show in 2022, documented in Lauren Sherman’s contemporary report. That cultural story matters, but I would not mistake television recognition for a reason to buy any particular edition.

The detail that really catches my attention is Fondazione Lisio’s account of supplying the fabrics. It describes hand-woven textiles for Baguettes from 1997 onward and a special 2007 Great Wall model. Its FF velvet required a creel carrying 800 bobbins; the later “Jungle Fever” design combined cut velvet with lampas. That is a far better explanation of why two bags with the same basic silhouette can be very different objects.

I would start with a textile Baguette if the purpose is to explore that expressive side of Fendi. For a purchase, I would then ask about the exact material and care requirements. Admiring elaborate weaving is one thing; choosing it for the way you actually use a bag is another. The craft account is not a durability test or an authentication of a resale listing.

The Peekaboo: look inside, and keep the dates honest

The Peekaboo’s exterior/interior contrast is the part I would examine first. There is also a source discrepancy worth spelling out: Fendi’s product description says it was created in 2009, while LVMH’s house profile gives 2008. Coverage commonly identifies the Spring/Summer 2009 collection. A collection year and its preceding presentation can differ, but those sources alone do not establish the exact reason for their conflicting creation dates.

My first comparison would be a structured Peekaboo against a compact Baguette, with the actual references beside each other. I would choose the former to investigate the opening construction and the latter for the underarm silhouette. Neither family name establishes that a specific phone, wallet or daily load will fit. That is a question for the particular dimensions and a careful in-person check, not brand mythology.

LVMH ownership is not the same as creative authorship

LVMH’s recorded 2000 acquisition and 2001 majority-shareholder milestone describe a corporate transition. I would keep that separate from who designed a collection or a bag. Ownership can explain the business structure; it does not make an individual design more useful to you, or prove that every later change was an improvement.

The official profile identifies Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana as the house’s Roman headquarters. The creative timeline needs more care: Kim Jones’s womenswear-and-couture chapter ran from 2020 to 2024; Silvia’s centenary-year direction followed; her honorary role and Chiuri’s appointment then created a new arrangement. “Still led by the family” would be too vague an account of those distinct responsibilities.

Five seated women with visible Anna, Carla, Franca, Alda and Paola labels
The retained five-sisters image; the visible labels identify the sequence.

The UAE boutique comparison I would actually make

I would use Fendi’s UAE site to identify the reference and arrange a specific comparison, not walk into a boutique expecting the whole archive. Bring the model, material, dimensions and a short list of what you need it to carry. I would not import a US price, a runway sample or a historic fabric specification into a claim about today’s UAE stock.

Four questions that turn the history into a useful decision

  • Which design are you responding to? Write down whether it is the underarm silhouette, an opening interior, a textile or simply the logo. I would not pay for a feature I cannot name.
  • What is the exact reference? Compare dimensions, strap configuration, material and included pieces for the two actual bags—not two broad collection names.
  • What would you carry? Ask to check the essentials without forcing the closure or assuming an interior partition moves. A beautiful shape that does not suit the job is the wrong purchase.
  • What happens after the sale? Get care advice, local terms and any repair assessment for that material. For resale, seek provenance and suitable authentication rather than treating a monogram photo as proof.

A New Chapter: Maria Grazia Chiuri Returns (2025–)

Fendi’s 14 October 2025 appointment release names Maria Grazia Chiuri Chief Creative Officer. Separately, the September announcement gives Silvia Venturini Fendi’s Honorary President role effect from 1 October, with a heritage and Fendi Casa focus. Calling both the current creative director would obscure the actual change.

Chiuri’s Milan debut took place on 25 February 2026, corroborated by AP’s contemporary report. The house’s own collection account explains the collective-work theme and points to revisited fur through its Echo of Love atelier. Fendi’s official July presentation account identifies her first couture collection in Rome. These are documented milestones, not shows I claim to have attended or independently assessed in full.

My question for the new chapter is whether the individual clothes and accessories make that collective history tangible. A compelling appointment is a reason to look closely, not an automatic five-star verdict on everything produced under it.

My verdict: choose the design, not a ready-made status symbol

I think Fendi is at its most interesting when the construction or textile gives you something to talk about beyond the name. The Baguette’s fabric experiments and the Peekaboo’s interior play are stronger reasons to investigate than an assurance that a logo will do the styling for you. The history becomes worth knowing when it sharpens what you notice.

For me, the research starting point would be an expressive textile Baguette, followed by a Peekaboo comparison to see a different design idea. That is a clear editorial preference, not a wear test or advice to buy unseen. Keep the price, condition, material and purpose in the decision; a century of history does not settle them for you.

For another take on a house built around distinctive design codes, our Dolce & Gabbana history separates its creative identity from its controversies. A brand history should help you form a view, not require admiration.

Source check, 19 October 2026: official house and corporate accounts, the appointment release, the fabric supplier’s account, a specific museum object and attributed contemporary reporting. The Peekaboo dates and foundation/boutique distinction are made explicit. All six existing images were viewed and retained; no new visit, ownership, archive handling or product test is claimed. Actual author, publication date, indexing and canonical are unchanged.

Questions answered

When did Fendi begin?

Adele and Edoardo Fendi founded the Roman house in 1925; its centenary was in 2025. LVMH separately dates the first boutique photograph to 1926.

When did the FF signature appear?

Fendi links FF and the Fun Fur direction to 1965, the year Karl Lagerfeld joined the house.

When was the Baguette introduced?

The Baguette dates to 1997 and is identified with Silvia Venturini Fendi. Fondazione Lisio documents its fabric collaboration from that year.

What date belongs to the Peekaboo?

It is associated with the Spring/Summer 2009 collection. Fendi’s product account says 2009, while LVMH’s house profile says 2008. This guide identifies the discrepancy rather than claiming one uncontested creation date.

Who leads Fendi creatively now?

Maria Grazia Chiuri was appointed Chief Creative Officer on 14 October 2025. Silvia Venturini Fendi became Honorary President from 1 October 2025, a distinct heritage-focused role.

Does this guide confirm every model in UAE shops?

No. Check the exact reference, dimensions, material, price and availability through Fendi’s UAE site or the chosen boutique.

Related Stories

A person in a leather jacket stands in front of a Versace logo.
Lifestyle

Pieter Mulier is Versace’s New Chief Creative Officer

I’m interested in what Pieter Mulier will do to a Versace silhouette—not whether someone calls it a new era. He became the house’s Chief Creative Officer on 1 July 2026, after the 5 February appointment announcement. That news is confirmed. The creative verdict still belongs to the clothes, not the job title. The background that…

Read Story