Tech
The Music Industry Vs AI

The music industry is currently embroiled in a battle against the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on the creation, distribution, and consumption of music. This fight is being led by key players such as the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and various tech companies. Here’s an in-depth look at the ongoing conflict and its implications. The Music Industry Vs AI.

The Emergence of AI in Music
Artificial intelligence has made significant strides in various industries, including music. AI can now compose songs, create lyrics, and even perform music. Tools like Google’s Magenta and OpenAI’s Jukedeck have showcased AI’s potential to generate music that closely mimics human composition. These advancements, while innovative, pose challenges to the traditional music industry.

The Threat to Copyright and Creativity
One of the primary concerns is the potential infringement on copyright laws. AI-generated music can closely imitate existing songs, raising questions about originality and intellectual property rights. The RIAA has expressed concerns that AI tools might be used to create derivative works without proper licensing, leading to potential legal battles over copyright violations.
Skype Is Dead
Furthermore, there is a fear that AI might undermine human creativity. Artists and musicians invest significant time and effort into their craft, and the ease with which AI can produce music could devalue their work. This has led to a call for stricter regulations and guidelines to protect human creativity and ensure fair compensation for artists.

Industry Response and Legal Actions
In response to these challenges, the music industry has started taking legal and regulatory actions. The RIAA has been at the forefront, advocating for policies that safeguard artists’ rights and ensure that AI-generated music adheres to copyright laws. There have been discussions about updating copyright regulations to address the unique challenges posed by AI.
Tech companies, on the other hand, are working on ways to integrate AI into the music industry responsibly. Some companies are developing AI tools that assist rather than replace human artists. These tools can help musicians with tasks like mixing, mastering, and even generating ideas, thereby enhancing human creativity rather than overshadowing it.
READ MORE: Podcasts Killed the Radio Star

The Role of AI in Music Distribution
AI is also playing a significant role in music distribution. Platforms like Spotify and Apple Music use AI algorithms to curate playlists and recommend songs to users. While this enhances user experience, it also raises concerns about the impact on artists. There is a fear that AI-driven recommendations might favour already popular artists, making it harder for new and independent musicians to gain visibility.
The industry is exploring ways to ensure that AI-driven platforms promote a diverse range of artists. This includes tweaking algorithms to support emerging artists and ensuring that AI recommendations do not solely rely on popularity metrics.

Ethical and Cultural Considerations
Beyond legal and economic implications, the rise of AI in music also brings up ethical and cultural questions. There is a debate about the authenticity of AI-generated music and its place in the cultural landscape. Some argue that music, as an expression of human emotion and experience, cannot be authentically replicated by machines.
On the cultural front, there is a concern that AI might lead to a homogenisation of music. With AI generating music based on patterns and data, there is a risk that unique cultural and regional styles might be overshadowed by more generic, data-driven compositions.

Looking Ahead: Collaboration Over Conflict
While the music industry’s AI fight is complex, there is a growing consensus that collaboration between tech companies and the music industry might be the best way forward. By working together, they can develop AI tools that support and enhance human creativity while ensuring that artists’ rights are protected.
Efforts are being made to create ethical guidelines for AI in music, focusing on transparency, accountability, and respect for intellectual property. The goal is to harness AI’s potential in a way that benefits artists, consumers, and the industry as a whole.

Conclusion
The integration of AI into the music industry is inevitable, and while it brings challenges, it also offers opportunities for innovation and growth. The key lies in finding a balance where AI can complement human creativity without undermining it. By establishing clear regulations and fostering collaboration, the music industry can navigate the AI era successfully, ensuring that both artists and technology can thrive together.

For more insights into the latest trends and developments in the music industry, visit What’s Hot in UAE.
Tech
Skype Is Dead

Skype, once the poster child for global internet communication, is officially reaching the end of its journey. Microsoft has confirmed that Skype is dead and the iconic voice and video calling service will be permanently shut down on 5 May 2025, drawing the curtain on a platform that helped define the early years of digital connectivity.
In a statement published across official Microsoft channels, users were informed that Skype accounts will soon transition to Microsoft Teams, a platform that has surged in popularity over the past few years. This decision marks a definitive pivot for Microsoft as it consolidates its communication tools.

From Internet Phenomenon to Forgotten Pioneer
Launched in 2003, Skype transformed the way we communicated. It was not the first VoIP service, but its free computer-to-computer calls made international communication accessible and even magical. By 2011, Skype had been downloaded over a billion times. That same year, Microsoft acquired it for $8.5 billion (AED 31.2 billion), then the tech giant’s largest purchase.
Skype became a household name and found its way into everyday vocabulary. “Let’s Skype” replaced phone calls in homes, schools, and workplaces around the world. But as competitors entered the market—WhatsApp, Zoom, FaceTime, and Facebook Messenger—Skype’s dominance slowly eroded.
What’s Special About iOS 18.2? Apple’s Latest Features Unveiled
Apple Music Now Available on Rekordbox & Serato
Despite integration into Xbox and Windows, Skype began losing ground. A major redesign in 2017, criticised for mimicking Snapchat-style features, was poorly received. Many long-time users lamented that Microsoft was tampering with a platform that wasn’t broken to begin with. This dissatisfaction contributed to the perception that Skype is dead.

The Turning Point: Teams Takes Over
When Windows 11 launched in 2021 without Skype pre-installed, the writing was on the wall. Instead, Microsoft began pushing Teams, which quickly became essential during the COVID-19 pandemic as businesses, educators, and individuals flocked to video meetings. Microsoft’s choice to end Skype’s service only confirmed for many that Skype is dead.
Now, with a streamlined digital ecosystem as its goal, Microsoft has announced that Skype’s features—such as one-on-one and group calls, file sharing, and messaging—will live on within Teams. In a detailed blog post, Jeff Teper, President of Collaborative Apps and Platforms at Microsoft, said:
“Teams offers enhanced features such as hosting meetings, managing calendars, and building and joining communities—all for free.”

What Happens to Skype Users?
Existing Skype users can continue accessing their chats and contacts by signing into Microsoft Teams with their Skype credentials. Microsoft has provided tools to export Skype chat history, contacts, and call logs, ensuring users retain their data.
For those using paid services, including Skype Credit or subscriptions, Microsoft confirmed they will remain active until the end of each user’s next renewal period.
End of an Era, and the Legacy It Leaves
News of Skype’s official shutdown has triggered nostalgia across social media. One user on X (formerly Twitter) shared:
“My best friend and I shared so many memories on Skype. It’s like losing a piece of my adolescence.”
Another former user told the BBC how Skype made long-distance love possible:
“We were in a transatlantic relationship. Skype made it bearable. It was such a magical tool before the age of smartphones and WhatsApp.”
And Anna Simpson, a digital marketer based in the UK, reflected that the announcement reinforced the sentiment that Skype is dead.
“I used to call my grandparents in France on Skype nearly 20 years ago. It felt like science fiction—pixelated faces instead of overpriced international calls.”

Why Did Skype Fade?
Skype’s downfall wasn’t due to lack of innovation—it pioneered many of the features we now take for granted. But changing user expectations, clunky interface updates, and an increasingly competitive market all played a role.
By the time Microsoft shifted focus to Teams, Skype was already gasping for relevance. The Teams platform, with deep integration into the Office ecosystem, has since become a go-to solution for both professional and personal communication, further establishing why Skype is dead.
The decision to retire Skype is more symbolic than shocking. The platform has been, as many have described, on “life support” for years.

What’s Next for Users?
- Move to Microsoft Teams: Simply log in using your Skype credentials.
- Export your data: Chats, contacts, and call logs can be saved.
- Use Skype Credit: Until your next billing renewal.
Microsoft has published a comprehensive guide for migrating from Skype to Teams on its official blog.

Final Thoughts
Skype may be bowing out, but it leaves behind a massive digital legacy. From families separated by continents to businesses conducting their first video calls, Skype showed us the magic of online communication long before it became the norm.
Microsoft Teams may be the future, but Skype will always be remembered as the service that made video calls a reality for millions. Nonetheless, the sentiment that Skype is dead underlines its place in tech history.
Read more in our online magazine:
Mozilla Faces Backlash Over Firefox Privacy Changes
Apple to Discontinue Vision Pro Production
Tech
Apple Music Now Available on Rekordbox & Serato

Apple has officially entered the DJ streaming landscape, launching “DJ with Apple Music”—a groundbreaking new feature allowing DJs to seamlessly integrate their Apple Music subscription directly into professional DJ software and hardware. Confirmed simultaneously by industry-leading DJ platforms Serato and Rekordbox, this integration positions Apple Music alongside other popular DJ streaming services such as Tidal, Beatport, Beatsource, SoundCloud, and Amazon Music.
Here’s everything you need to know about this major announcement, what it means for DJs, and how to access this game-changing functionality.

Integrating Apple Music into DJ Software and Hardware
Until recently, Apple Music was mainly a personal listening platform. However, DJs can now leverage their Apple Music libraries directly through:
- Laptop-Based Software:
- Serato DJ Pro & Rekordbox: Both industry-standard DJ software now fully support Apple Music integration. DJs simply need to update to the latest software versions to start mixing tracks directly from their Apple Music library.
- Rekordbox for iOS/iPadOS: Mobile DJs are also covered, as Rekordbox’s mobile apps have integrated Apple Music streaming, providing even greater flexibility.
- Standalone DJ Equipment:
- Compatible standalone hardware from leading brands like Denon DJ, Numark, and AlphaTheta (formerly Pioneer DJ) have also announced firmware updates to support Apple Music. Devices now compatible include:
- AlphaTheta XDJ-AZ, Omnis Duo
- Denon DJ Prime 4+, SC Live 4, SC Live 2, Prime Go+
- Numark Mixstream Pro Go, Mixstream Pro+
- Compatible standalone hardware from leading brands like Denon DJ, Numark, and AlphaTheta (formerly Pioneer DJ) have also announced firmware updates to support Apple Music. Devices now compatible include:

Google Tackles Explicit Deepfakes
Skype Is Dead
Why is Apple Music’s DJ Integration Significant?
Apple Music’s arrival into DJ ecosystems is a huge development, primarily because of the platform’s sheer size and subscriber base—second only to Spotify, which remains notably absent from professional DJ integrations.
This strategic move by Apple provides several key advantages:
- No Additional Fees: Unlike certain other services, Apple Music doesn’t require extra fees or special DJ subscription tiers, making it instantly attractive to existing subscribers.
- Expanded Accessibility: DJs who already curate playlists and libraries within Apple Music can now easily use the same platform for both personal listening and professional DJing, streamlining their music management.
- Curated DJ Playlists: Apple has introduced specially curated DJ playlists designed specifically for performance, offering DJs ready-made sets for different genres and moods.

Key Features and Functionalities
Here’s what DJs can expect from Apple Music integration into Serato and Rekordbox:
- Library Syncing: DJs can now keep their personal music libraries synced alongside streaming playlists in Apple Music. This feature simplifies workflow significantly by eliminating the need to manage multiple platforms.
- Cloud Integration: For Rekordbox users, cue points, beat grids, loops, and track analysis information can be stored in the cloud, accessible from any compatible device.
- Streaming Only: Currently, Apple Music does not support offline storage for DJing purposes. DJs must have an active internet connection during performance to access streaming tracks.
- No Stems Functionality (Yet): At present, the integration does not support advanced “stems” features offered by some DJ platforms, though this may change in future updates.

Supported vs. Unsupported Hardware
As of now, Apple Music integration is officially supported only by select standalone DJ equipment (listed above). Hardware such as Pioneer DJ’s XDJ-XZ, Opus Quad, SC6000, XDJ-RX3, and the Numark Prime 2 and Prime Go are currently unsupported.
DJs using Serato and Rekordbox software via laptops face no such restrictions, as integration is universal across compatible laptop setups.
What About Other DJ Software?
At this time, Apple Music integration is limited to Serato DJ Pro, Rekordbox, and Algoriddim’s Djay Pro, which added Apple Music compatibility previously. Other popular DJ software such as Traktor and VirtualDJ have not yet announced integration.
Is Apple Music Better Than Other DJ Streaming Services?
While Apple Music presents major advantages—particularly if you’re already an Apple Music subscriber—each streaming platform has distinct strengths and weaknesses:
- Tidal offers lossless audio quality.
- Beatport & Beatsource provide curated DJ-centric tracks and genre-specific sets.
- SoundCloud features a vast independent music library.
Ultimately, DJs should evaluate their personal preferences and workflow needs when choosing a streaming platform.

Future of DJing and Streaming
Apple Music’s significant entry into the professional DJ sphere represents a turning point. It marks a broader industry shift, acknowledging streaming as a mainstream rather than niche option for DJs. As Apple further refines and expands this functionality, expect other platforms and DJ software to accelerate their streaming integrations.
Final Thoughts: A New Era for DJs
With the addition of Apple Music to Serato and Rekordbox, DJs worldwide now have unprecedented access to one of the world’s largest music streaming libraries. Seamless integration, curated playlists, and no additional subscription costs position Apple Music as an attractive new choice for DJs everywhere.

For DJs already embedded in Apple’s ecosystem, this update makes perfect sense, offering convenience, ease, and powerful capabilities at their fingertips.
Discover more cutting-edge tech news and innovations at: https://whatshotinuae.com
How to Hide Files and Folders on macOS
Teenage Engineering: Knockout with the KO II
Tech
Mozilla Faces Backlash Over Firefox Privacy Changes

Mozilla, long celebrated for its privacy-first approach, is now facing intense criticism after making changes to Firefox’s Terms of Use and Privacy Notice. The open-source browser, which has historically positioned itself as an alternative to data-hungry tech giants, is now under fire for rewording its privacy commitments—prompting concern from longtime users.

The Controversy: What Changed?
Mozilla introduced its first-ever Terms of Use for Firefox, alongside updates to its Privacy Notice and FAQ page. While Mozilla claims these changes were meant to improve transparency, many users believe they signal a shift away from the company’s core privacy values.
🚨 The Original Terms of Use Stated:
https://whatshotinuae.com/apple-introduces-eye-tracking-in-ios-18-ipados-18/“When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox.”
Gmail Users on High Alert: Sophisticated AI Phishing Scams Uncovered
Akai And Native Instruments Collab for MPC 3
This language implied that Mozilla had broad rights over user-submitted data, leading to fears that the company was claiming ownership over personal information.
After backlash from the open-source community, Mozilla removed this clause, stating it was misinterpreted legal boilerplate.

Mozilla’s Response: A Quick but Unconvincing Fix?
Following user outrage, Ajit Varma, Mozilla’s VP of Firefox Product, issued a statement clarifying that:
🛑 Mozilla does NOT own user data
🔍 The clause was only meant to explain Firefox’s basic functionality
📝 The wording has now been updated to avoid confusion
While this explanation may have calmed some users, another major change added fuel to the fire:
📝 Mozilla quietly removed its promise that Firefox does not sell user data.

Firefox’s Privacy Policy: What’s Missing?
Previously, Mozilla proudly stated:
“Firefox is the only major browser backed by a not-for-profit that doesn’t sell your personal data to advertisers.”
Now, this statement has been reworded to:
“Firefox, the only major browser backed by a not-for-profit, helps you protect your personal information.”
Similarly, Mozilla’s response to the FAQ question “Is Firefox free?” previously read:
“Yep! The Firefox Browser is free. Super free, actually. No hidden costs or anything. You don’t pay anything to use it, and we don’t sell your personal data.”
The new version completely omits the data-selling disclaimer, now reading:
“Yep! The Firefox Browser is free. Super free, actually. No hidden costs or anything. You don’t pay anything to use it.”
While Mozilla claims this change was made due to legal variations in how different jurisdictions define ‘selling data’, users see it as a red flag.
Mozilla’s Changing Leadership & Business Direction
Some are speculating that Mozilla’s shift in language may be connected to recent leadership changes. In December 2024, Mozilla brought in several new executives, including:
- Ajit Varma – Formerly with Meta & Google, now VP of Firefox Product
- Anthony Enzor-DeMeo – Ex-Wayfair & Better.com, now Senior VP of Firefox
- Girish Rao – Previously at Warner Bros, EA & Cisco, now SVP of Infrastructure
Mozilla’s CEO Laura Chambers, who took over in early 2024, has been making aggressive changes, including deep staffing cuts at the Mozilla Foundation.

Is Mozilla Heading Toward an Ad-Driven Future?
While Mozilla insists it is not selling user data, critics argue that these policy changes align with a shift toward monetization.
🔹 Mozilla already profits from search partnerships—Google reportedly pays Mozilla $450 million per year to make Google the default search engine in Firefox.
🔹 The company has invested heavily in ad-supported services like Mozilla VPN and Pocket (its content recommendation platform).
Users fear that Mozilla’s move away from clear anti-tracking promises could signal an increased focus on data monetization—bringing it closer to the business models of Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge.

The Fallout: What’s Next for Firefox?
The backlash has sparked heated discussions on Mozilla’s official forums, Reddit, and tech communities.
Some users are now exploring privacy-focused Firefox alternatives, such as:
🔹 Waterfox – A Firefox-based browser that removes telemetry and tracking
🔹 LibreWolf – A security-focused, open-source browser with enhanced privacy features
🔹 Floorp – A highly customizable, privacy-first alternative
While Firefox remains a strong competitor in the privacy browser market, the latest controversy raises serious concerns about its future direction.
Will Mozilla maintain its reputation as a privacy-first company, or is this the beginning of a more commercial approach?
Only time will tell.
Read more in our online magazine: 😎
https://whatshotinuae.com
Blockchain Beyond Bitcoin: How the UAE is Using Crypto in Real Estate and Fashion
META Just Revealed The Future of AR
-
Bars2 weeks ago
106 Amazing Things to Do in Dubai in 2025
-
Concerts1 week ago
JENNIFER LOPEZ IN ABU DHABI – EVERYTHING ABOUT HER RETURN
-
Tech2 weeks ago
Skype Is Dead
-
Lifestyle3 weeks ago
DRESSCØDE: Redefining Nightlife Fashion in the UAE
-
Lifestyle2 weeks ago
Travis Scott x Chase B x Jordan Jumpman: The Next Sneaker Drop Coming Soon
-
Entrepreneur2 weeks ago
How to Get Into the Private Crypto & NFT Investment Circles in the UAE
-
Concerts2 weeks ago
Katy Perry to Headline Abu Dhabi Grand Prix 2025 Race-Day Concert
-
Lifestyle5 days ago
Why Michael Jordan is the king of sneakers